How to Get DUI Charges Dropped in Colorado: Step-by-Step

Steve Prager
Written By: Attorney Steve Prager
Why you can trust this guide

Our content is written legal experts and reviewed by experienced criminal defense attorneys with deep trial experience. We follow strict internal standards so that everything we share is reliable, transparent, and up to date.

  • Expert: Steve Prager — Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor; supervised the domestic violence prosecution unit in El Paso County before founding Prager Law
  • Experience: Licensed in Colorado for 8 years; handled 40+ jury trials across the state; extensive background in criminal charges, DUI charges, domestic violence and serious criminal cases
  • Last updated: October 2025

DUI charges in Colorado can be dropped when constitutional violations, procedural errors, or insufficient evidence undermine the prosecution’s case beyond a reasonable doubt. The key is to act quickly to preserve evidence, request hearings, meet critical deadlines, and identify specific legal defects in the arrest process. If you want to get DUI charges dropped, immediate action to request hearings, document facts, and build a defense strategy that targets weaknesses in the state’s evidence is essential. Contact a DUI lawyer immediately to begin preserving evidence and asserting your rights.

Can DUI Charges Actually Be Dropped In Colorado?

Yes, DUI charges can be dropped in Colorado when the prosecution cannot prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt or when constitutional violations occurred during the arrest. Common grounds for dismissal include illegal traffic stops, improperly administered field sobriety tests, faulty breathalyzer calibration, and violations of Miranda rights. The success of getting charges dropped depends on identifying specific procedural errors or constitutional violations and presenting compelling evidence to challenge the prosecution’s case.

Understanding Legal Grounds For DUI Dismissal In Colorado

The foundation of any successful DUI dismissal rests on constitutional protections and evidentiary requirements that prosecutors must satisfy. Colorado DUI cases can be dismissed when the state fails to meet its burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt or when law enforcement violated your constitutional rights during the investigation.

Fourth Amendment violations represent one of the strongest grounds for dismissal. This constitutional protection guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, meaning police must have reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop and probable cause to arrest you for DUI. If officers lacked proper justification for either action, any evidence gathered afterward—including breath tests, blood draws, and field sobriety tests—becomes inadmissible in court.

Due process violations under the Fourteenth Amendment can also lead to case dismissal. These occur when police fail to follow proper procedures during your arrest, such as not providing Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation or denying you access to an attorney when legally required.

Evidentiary issues frequently result in dropped charges as well. The prosecution must establish an unbroken chain of custody for blood samples, prove breathalyzer machines were properly calibrated and maintained, and demonstrate that field sobriety tests were administered according to NHTSA standards. Any gaps or failures in this evidence can create reasonable doubt about your guilt.

Challenging The Initial Traffic Stop

The traffic stop often represents the weakest link in the prosecution’s case, making it a prime target for dismissal motions. Police officers must have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity or traffic violations to justify pulling you over—a hunch or anonymous tip without corroborating evidence isn’t enough under Colorado law.

Examining the officer’s stated reason for the stop carefully reveals potential grounds for dismissal. Common invalid justifications include anonymous tips without independent verification, stops based solely on leaving a bar or late-night driving, or pretextual stops where officers cite minor violations as cover for DUI investigations without reasonable suspicion of impairment.

Dash camera footage, body camera recordings, and dispatch logs provide vital evidence for challenging stops. These records often reveal discrepancies between the officer’s testimony and what actually occurred. Request this evidence immediately through discovery motions, as departments sometimes have limited retention periods for digital recordings.

Pay close attention to the timing and sequence of events. Did the officer observe actual traffic violations, or were driving patterns within normal parameters? Were turn signals used properly, was weaving actually occurring, or did the vehicle maintain its lane? Officers sometimes exaggerate minor deviations to justify stops that wouldn’t otherwise meet legal standards.

Review the officer’s report alongside video evidence to identify inconsistencies. When police testimony contradicts recorded evidence, it undermines the credibility of the entire case and strengthens your position for suppression motions, dismissal, or plea negotiations.

Questioning Field Sobriety Test Administration

Field sobriety tests must follow strict NHTSA protocols to be admissible in Colorado courts, and deviations from these standards can render results unreliable or inadmissible. The standardized tests—horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk-and-turn, and one-leg stand—require specific instructions, demonstrations, and environmental conditions to produce valid results.

Environmental factors impact test reliability substantially. Uneven surfaces, poor lighting, inclement weather, or heavy traffic create conditions that can cause sober individuals to fail these tests. Officers should account for these factors or seek alternative testing locations when possible.

Medical conditions and physical limitations can also affect test performance. Inner ear problems, knee or back injuries, neurological conditions, or certain medications can impair balance and coordination regardless of alcohol consumption. Age and obesity are additional factors that influence test reliability.

Officer training and certification records reveal whether the administering officer was properly qualified to conduct and interpret field sobriety tests. Request these records through discovery to verify the officer’s credentials and identify any lapses in required continuing education or certification renewals.

Document any deviations from standard procedures during your tests. Did the officer provide complete instructions? Were demonstrations performed correctly? Was the testing area appropriate? These details can challenge the validity of test results and create doubt about their accuracy.

Challenging Breathalyzer And Blood Test Results

Scientific evidence in DUI cases often appears unassailable, but breathalyzer and blood test results have numerous vulnerabilities that skilled defense attorneys can challenge. These tests require precise calibration, proper maintenance, and adherence to strict protocols to produce reliable results.

Breathalyzer machines need regular calibration checks using certified alcohol solutions to ensure accuracy. Maintenance logs, calibration records, and error reports can reveal gaps in proper machine upkeep that call results into question. Some devices have known issues with radio frequency interference, temperature fluctuations, or software glitches that affect readings.

The rising blood alcohol defense challenges the timing of tests relative to your last drink. Your blood alcohol content continues rising for 30–90 minutes after consuming alcohol, meaning you could test over the legal limit despite being under the limit while driving. Expert testimony can demonstrate this physiological process and create reasonable doubt about your impairment level during the actual driving.

Blood test chain of custody must be documented meticulously from collection through laboratory analysis. Any breaks in this chain—missing signatures, storage temperature issues, delayed processing, or laboratory contamination—can compromise sample integrity and lead to inadmissible results.

Medical conditions and medications can also affect test accuracy. Diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and certain prescription drugs can produce false positives on breath tests or affect blood alcohol metabolism rates.

Reviewing Police Procedures And Documentation

Every aspect of your DUI arrest must follow specific procedures designed to protect your constitutional rights, and procedural violations can result in evidence suppression or case dismissal. Police reports, body camera footage, and booking records provide a detailed timeline of your arrest that can reveal critical errors.

Miranda warnings must be given before any custodial interrogation about your drinking or driving. Officers sometimes attempt to gather incriminating statements without proper warnings, making those statements inadmissible in court. Review recordings carefully to identify when custody began and whether warnings were properly administered.

The 15-minute observation period before breath testing is mandatory in Colorado to ensure accuracy. Officers must continuously observe you during this time to verify you haven’t consumed anything, vomited, or engaged in other activities that could affect test results. Gaps in observation can invalidate breath test results.

Booking procedures must also follow proper protocols. You should be allowed to contact an attorney and given access to phone calls within reasonable time limits. Delays in booking or denial of communication rights can violate due process protections.

Compare multiple officers’ reports for consistency. Discrepancies between different accounts of the same events suggest unreliable testimony and can undermine the prosecution’s credibility. Video evidence often contradicts written reports, revealing exaggerations or inaccuracies in police documentation.

Working With Expert Witnesses And Technical Evidence

Expert witnesses provide vital testimony to challenge the scientific and technical aspects of DUI evidence that jurors might otherwise accept without question. Several types of specialists can identify flaws in testing procedures, explain alternative explanations for observed impairment, and educate juries about the limitations of prosecution evidence:

  • Toxicology experts can challenge blood and breath test results by explaining factors that affect accuracy, such as biological variations in alcohol metabolism, medical conditions that mimic impairment, and laboratory testing errors. They can also testify about retrograde extrapolation—calculating blood alcohol levels at the time of driving based on test results hours later.
  • Accident reconstruction specialists become valuable when your case involves allegations of impaired driving causing an accident. These experts can analyze physical evidence, vehicle damage, and scene conditions to provide alternative explanations for collision causation that don’t involve alcohol impairment.
  • Former police officers with DUI enforcement experience can testify about proper procedures and identify where investigating officers deviated from standard protocols. Their insider knowledge carries particular weight with juries who might otherwise defer to law enforcement testimony.
  • Video analysis experts can enhance and interpret surveillance footage, body camera recordings, and dash camera videos to highlight evidence that supports your defense or contradicts prosecution claims about your behavior or driving patterns.

The effectiveness of expert testimony depends on selecting qualified professionals whose credentials and experience directly relate to the specific technical issues in your case. Early consultation with potential experts allows adequate time for thorough evidence review and preparation of compelling testimony that can substantially impact your case outcome.

Negotiating With Prosecutors For Charge Reduction Or Dismissal

Strong defense evidence provides negotiating power in plea discussions with district attorneys who would rather secure a conviction on reduced charges than risk losing at trial. Presenting compelling evidence of case weaknesses early in the process often leads to favorable plea agreements or outright dismissals.

Colorado prosecutors may agree to reduce DUI charges to Driving While Ability Impaired (DWAI) when evidence suggests your blood alcohol level was close to the legal limit or when field sobriety test results are questionable. DWAI carries lighter penalties and may avoid some collateral consequences like lengthy license suspensions.

Reckless driving reductions represent another common outcome when DUI evidence is weak. This charge avoids the stigma and consequences of alcohol-related offenses while still allowing prosecutors to obtain a conviction for dangerous driving behavior.

Successful negotiations require demonstrating specific weaknesses in the prosecution’s case rather than general challenges to DUI charges. Detailed analysis of evidence, expert opinions, and procedural violations provide concrete reasons for prosecutors to consider reduced charges or dismissals.

Timing matters in plea negotiations. Early presentation of defense evidence—before prosecutors invest time and resources in the case—often yields better results than last-minute attempts to negotiate favorable deals. If you’re facing charges in the Denver area, speaking with a Denver DUI lawyer early can give you the best chance to preserve evidence and negotiate effectively.

Protecting Your License Through DMV Hearings

Colorado’s administrative license revocation process operates separately from criminal proceedings, but success in DMV hearings can strengthen your criminal defense and preserve your driving privileges. You have just seven days from your arrest to request this hearingmissing this deadline results in automatic license suspension.

DMV hearings focus on four specific issues: whether police had reasonable grounds to believe you were driving under the influence, whether you were placed under arrest, whether you refused chemical testing or tested over the legal limit, and whether you were properly advised of consequences for refusing or failing chemical tests.

The burden of proof at DMV hearings is lower than in criminal court—preponderance of the evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the same constitutional and procedural defenses that apply in criminal cases can also succeed at DMV hearings.

Winning a DMV hearing prevents license suspension and demonstrates to criminal prosecutors that their evidence may not be strong enough for conviction. Even if you face criminal penalties, maintaining driving privileges allows you to continue working and meeting family obligations during the legal process.

Present the same evidence challenging your arrest at both DMV and criminal proceedings. Inconsistent officer testimony between hearings can undermine credibility in both forums and strengthen your overall defense strategy.

Critical Deadlines And Timeline For Action

Colorado DUI cases involve multiple deadlines that can eliminate defense options if missed, making immediate action vital after your arrest. Understanding and meeting these critical timeframes can mean the difference between a successful defense and lost opportunities:

  • Seven-day DMV hearing request deadline is absolute—no exceptions exist for weekends, holidays, or other circumstances. Missing this deadline results in automatic license suspension.
  • 35-day discovery request deadline from arraignment ensures adequate time for evidence review before trial. Important evidence like calibration records, maintenance logs, and video footage may be destroyed or become unavailable if not promptly requested through formal discovery motions.
  • 20-day pretrial motion deadline before trial applies in most jurisdictions for filing motions to suppress evidence based on constitutional violations or procedural errors. These motions require detailed legal argument and supporting evidence that takes time to prepare properly.
  • Six-month speedy trial timeline can work for or against you depending on your case circumstances. While you can demand trial within this timeframe from arraignment, it may not allow sufficient preparation for complex cases requiring expert testimony or extensive investigation.
  • Laboratory testing deadlines affect blood cases where samples must be analyzed within specific timeframes to maintain reliability. Chain of custody requirements also impose strict documentation deadlines that can invalidate evidence if not properly maintained.

Early consultation with experienced DUI defense counsel ensures these critical deadlines are met and defense strategies are implemented while evidence remains accessible and has not been destroyed. Delay greatly reduces your options for challenging charges and achieving favorable outcomes, making prompt action one of the most important decisions you can make after a DUI arrest.

Immediate Action Checklist (What To Do First)

  • Act immediately: contact an experienced DUI attorney right away.
  • Request the DMV hearing within seven days—do this first to protect your license.
  • Preserve and request evidence: ask for dashcam, body cam and dispatch logs, officer training records, and calibration/maintenance logs.
  • Document your recollection: write down your timeline, witnesses, and conditions (lighting, road surface, weather).
  • Do not discuss the case without counsel: avoid statements to police or prosecutors without your attorney present.
  • Prepare for discovery and suppression motions: ensure motions are filed within the 20–35 day windows as applicable.
  • Engage experts early: toxicologists, accident reconstructionists, and test protocol specialists.

Why This Matters Now

The searcher’s intent is urgent: they need a clear, actionable path to beat or dismiss a Colorado DUI—to challenge the stop, testing, probable cause, and procedures, and to preserve DMV rights. Deadlines come fast and early; early defense decisions can determine whether charges are reduced, dismissed, or proceed to trial. Documenting facts, requesting hearings promptly, and hiring counsel who can identify constitutional or procedural defects are the most effective steps toward getting DUI charges dropped or substantially reduced. Consulting a Denver DUI attorney without delay helps ensure evidence is preserved and the right motions are filed on time.

Final Notes

Getting charges dropped is possible but depends on swift, focused action: preserve evidence, request key recordings and records immediately, file timely motions, and engage qualified experts and counsel. Prioritize the seven-day DMV hearing, discovery requests, and suppression motions—these are the leverage points most likely to produce dismissals or favorable negotiations. If you’re in the Denver area, reach out to a Denver DUI lawyer to begin protecting your rights as soon as possible.

Do You Need Legal Help with Your Colorado Criminal Charges?

If you or someone you love is facing criminal charges in Colorado, don’t wait — contact the Colorado criminal defense lawyers at Prager Law today. Criminal charges are terrifying, and you deserve more than a cookie-cutter defense. At Prager Law, we provide personalized legal representation backed by real trial experience and insider knowledge of how prosecutors think.

Founding attorney Steve Prager is a former supervisor in the El Paso County District Attorney’s Office. He’s handled more than forty jury trials and trained new prosecutors — giving him rare insight into how cases are built and, more importantly, where they fall apart. That experience can be the difference between a conviction and a second chance.

Call 303-483-4452 or contact us online to discuss your case. We’ll review your situation, explain your legal options, and start building a strategic defense — one built just for you.

Steve Prager

Steve Prager

Criminal Defense Attorney, Founder at Prager Law

Steve Prager is criminal defense attorney and founder of Prager Law, a Denver-based criminal defense firm with a focus on DUI defense and domestic violence defense. A former prosecutor who once led the domestic violence unit in El Paso County, Steve brings a modern, strategic approach to every case—drawing from nearly a decade of experience on both sides of the courtroom. A fourth-generation Denver native, Steve is committed to protecting the rights of the accused with energy, empathy, and an unwavering belief in justice.